Wednesday after Trinity XVI - Devotion in semi-Exile
Tuesday after Trinity XVI - Devotion in semi-Exile
Deuteronomy 1:37-2:15 Matthew 6:1-15
Intimately related to Law and Gospel is the teaching of the ‘Third Use of the Law.’ Is it required of Christians to follow the Law? Or, now that we are freed from sin by the work of Christ, applied to us who believe, we are now free to do as we please?
Personally, I think these interesting questions because most people believe that Christianity is all about the ‘dos’ and ‘don’ts,’ whether we are ‘good enough’ to earn a place in God’s kingdom or not. Those who think Christianity is about being ‘good enough’ (or not), are not only the non-believers who claim we are trying to push our version of morality on them, but many who claim to be Christians.
Either Christ has accomplished my salvation or He hasn’t.
But, are good works required of Christians?
This is what we believe, as Confession/Evangelical/Orthodox Lutherans.
VI. The Third Use of the Law.
Status Controversiae.
The Principal Question In This Controversy.
1] Since the Law was given to men for three reasons: first, that thereby outward discipline might be maintained against wild, disobedient men [and that wild and intractable men might be restrained, as though by certain bars]; secondly, that men thereby may be led to the knowledge of their sins; thirdly, that after they are regenerate and [much of] the flesh notwithstanding cleaves to them, they might on this account have a fixed rule according to which they are to regulate and direct their whole life, a dissension has occurred between some few theologians concerning the third use of the Law, namely, whether it is to be urged or not upon regenerate Christians. The one side has said, Yea; the other, Nay.
Affirmative Theses.
The True Christian Doctrine concerning This Controversy.
2] 1. We believe, teach, and confess that, although men truly believing [in Christ] and truly converted to God have been freed and exempted from the curse and coercion of the Law, they nevertheless are not on this account without Law, but have been redeemed by the Son of God in order that they should exercise themselves in it day and night [that they should meditate upon God's Law day and night, and constantly exercise themselves in its observance, Ps. 1:2 ], Ps. 119. For even our first parents before the Fall did not live without Law, who had the Law of God written also into their hearts, because they were created in the image of God, Gen. 1:26f.; 2:16ff; 3:3.
Deuteronomy 1:37-2:15 Matthew 6:1-15
Intimately related to Law and Gospel is the teaching of the ‘Third Use of the Law.’ Is it required of Christians to follow the Law? Or, now that we are freed from sin by the work of Christ, applied to us who believe, we are now free to do as we please?
Personally, I think these interesting questions because most people believe that Christianity is all about the ‘dos’ and ‘don’ts,’ whether we are ‘good enough’ to earn a place in God’s kingdom or not. Those who think Christianity is about being ‘good enough’ (or not), are not only the non-believers who claim we are trying to push our version of morality on them, but many who claim to be Christians.
Either Christ has accomplished my salvation or He hasn’t.
But, are good works required of Christians?
This is what we believe, as Confession/Evangelical/Orthodox Lutherans.
VI. The Third Use of the Law.
Status Controversiae.
The Principal Question In This Controversy.
1] Since the Law was given to men for three reasons: first, that thereby outward discipline might be maintained against wild, disobedient men [and that wild and intractable men might be restrained, as though by certain bars]; secondly, that men thereby may be led to the knowledge of their sins; thirdly, that after they are regenerate and [much of] the flesh notwithstanding cleaves to them, they might on this account have a fixed rule according to which they are to regulate and direct their whole life, a dissension has occurred between some few theologians concerning the third use of the Law, namely, whether it is to be urged or not upon regenerate Christians. The one side has said, Yea; the other, Nay.
Affirmative Theses.
The True Christian Doctrine concerning This Controversy.
2] 1. We believe, teach, and confess that, although men truly believing [in Christ] and truly converted to God have been freed and exempted from the curse and coercion of the Law, they nevertheless are not on this account without Law, but have been redeemed by the Son of God in order that they should exercise themselves in it day and night [that they should meditate upon God's Law day and night, and constantly exercise themselves in its observance, Ps. 1:2 ], Ps. 119. For even our first parents before the Fall did not live without Law, who had the Law of God written also into their hearts, because they were created in the image of God, Gen. 1:26f.; 2:16ff; 3:3.
3] 2.
We believe, teach, and confess that the preaching of the Law is to be urged
with diligence, not only upon the unbelieving and impenitent, but also upon
true believers, who are truly converted, regenerate, and justified by faith.
4] 3.
For although they are regenerate and renewed in the spirit of their mind, yet
in the present life this regeneration and renewal is not complete, but only
begun, and believers are, by the spirit of their mind, in a constant struggle
against the flesh, that is, against the corrupt nature and disposition which
cleaves to us unto death. On account of this old Adam, which still inheres in
the understanding, the will, and all the powers of man, it is needful that the
Law of the Lord always shine before them, in order that they may not from human
devotion institute wanton and self-elected cults [that they may frame nothing
in a matter of religion from the desire of private devotion, and may not choose
divine services not instituted by God's Word]; likewise, that the old Adam also
may not employ his own will, but may be subdued against his will, not only by
the admonition and threatening of the Law, but also by punishments and blows,
so that he may follow and surrender himself captive to the Spirit, 1 Cor. 9:27; Rom. 6:12, Gal. 6:14; Ps. 119:1ff ; Heb. 13:21 (Heb. 12:1).
5] 4.
Now, as regards the distinction between the works of the Law and the fruits of
the Spirit, we believe, teach, and confess that the works which are done
according to the Law are and are called works of the Law as long as they are
only extorted from man by urging the punishment and threatening of God's wrath.
6] 5.
Fruits of the Spirit, however, are the works which the Spirit of God who dwells
in believers works through the regenerate, and which are done by believers so
far as they are regenerate [spontaneously and freely], as though they knew of
no command, threat, or reward; for in this manner the children of God live in
the Law and walk according to the Law of God, which [mode of living] St. Paul
in his epistles calls the Law of Christ and the Law of the mind, Rom. 7:25; 8:7; Rom. 8:2; Gal. 6:2.
7] 6.
Thus the Law is and remains both to the penitent and impenitent, both to
regenerate and unregenerate men, one [and the same] Law, namely, the immutable
will of God; and the difference, so far as concerns obedience, is alone in man,
inasmuch as one who is not yet regenerate does for the Law out of constraint
and unwillingly what it requires of him (as also the regenerate do according to
the flesh); but the believer, so far as he is regenerate, does without
constraint and with a willing spirit that which no threatenings [however
severe] of the Law could ever extort from him.
Negative Theses.
False Contrary Doctrine.
False Contrary Doctrine.
8] Accordingly,
we reject as a dogma and error injurious to, and conflicting with, Christian
discipline and true godliness the teaching that the Law in the above-mentioned
way and degree is not to be urged upon Christians and true believers, but only
upon unbelievers, non-Christians, and the impenitent.
Comments