Wednesday after Trinity XV - Devotion in semi-Exile
Wednesday after Trinity XV - Devotion in semi-Exile
Nehemiah 9:1-21 1 Timothy 5:17-6:2
It has been asked, what is the point of these ‘Lutheran Confessions?’ Do we believe these or the Scriptures? What purpose do they serve? I could try and answer these questions, but a dear friend, the beloved former President of Concordia Theological Seminary, has already done that. It may be a longer read today, but I think well worth it.
The Lutheran Confessions: What Are They?
The Spirit in Which They Were Written
We use the word "confession" in a variety of ways today. A young man confesses his love for his fiancee. A criminal confesses to a felony. Christians confess their sins to a fellow believer or at the appropriate time in the church service. The Lutheran Confessions are something quite different from all that. They are written, formal statements with which a group of Christians, or an individual, declare to the world their faith, their deepest and undaunted convictions.
Nehemiah 9:1-21 1 Timothy 5:17-6:2
It has been asked, what is the point of these ‘Lutheran Confessions?’ Do we believe these or the Scriptures? What purpose do they serve? I could try and answer these questions, but a dear friend, the beloved former President of Concordia Theological Seminary, has already done that. It may be a longer read today, but I think well worth it.
The Lutheran Confessions: What Are They?
The Spirit in Which They Were Written
We use the word "confession" in a variety of ways today. A young man confesses his love for his fiancee. A criminal confesses to a felony. Christians confess their sins to a fellow believer or at the appropriate time in the church service. The Lutheran Confessions are something quite different from all that. They are written, formal statements with which a group of Christians, or an individual, declare to the world their faith, their deepest and undaunted convictions.
The Lutheran
Confessions represent the result of more than 50 years of earnest endeavor by
Martin Luther and his followers to give Biblical and clear expression to their
religious convictions. The important word in that definition is the word
"convictions." This word reveals the spirit in which the Lutheran
Confessions were written, not a spirit of hesitation or doubt, but of deepest
confidence that Lutherans, when they were writing and subscribing the
Confessions and creeds, because their content was all drawn from the Word of
God, Scripture, were affirming the truth, the saving truth.
Listen to what the
Lutheran confessors say in the very last paragraph of the Book of Concord (FC
SD, XII, 40), a statement that describes their assurance and their doctrinal
certainty:
Therefore, it is
our intent to give witness before God and all Christendom, among those who are
alive today and those who will come after us, that the explanation here set
forth regarding all the controversial articles of faith which we have addressed
and explained—and no other explanation—is our teaching, faith, and confession.
In it we shall appear before the judgment throne of Jesus Christ, by God's
grace, with fearless hearts and thus give account of our faith, and we will
neither secretly nor publicly speak or write anything contrary to it. Instead,
on the strength of God's grace we intend to abide by this confession.
Here we observe
that those who wrote and signed the Lutheran Confessions were not merely
settling controversies, or expressing opinions, or devising new and clever
doctrinal formulations. They were confessing their faith and expressing their
determination never to depart from that confession. They take their stand as in
the presence of God and stake their very salvation on the doctrine they
confess. So confident are they of their position, so certain of their doctrine,
that they dare bind not only themselves but also their posterity to it. And in
another place they show their willingness to submit themselves not only to the
content but to the very phrases of their confession: "We have determined
not to depart even a finger's breadth either from the subjects themselves, or
from the phrases which are found in [the Confessions]" (Preface of the
Book of Concord, quoted from Concordia Triglotta [St. Louis: Concordia, 1921],
p. 23).
I am sure that
such a profession seems like an impossible anachronism today, a mark of
inflexible pride which can no longer be respected or emulated by enlightened
people. But certainly with such expressions of certainty the Confessions have
captured the spirit of Christ and the New Testament. Our Lord taught with
authority and promised His disciples that they would "know the
truth." And how often does the inspired apostle Paul dogmatically affirm,
"I know," "I speak the truth ... .. I am persuaded"!
The Lutheran
confessors are convinced that Christians, basing their doctrine on Scripture
and the promises of God, can be certain of their salvation and can formulate
and confess true statements about God and all the articles of the Christian
faith. It is this spirit in which all our Confessions were written and in which
they so eloquently give witness to the Gospel of Christ.
The Importance of
Doctrine
According to the Lutheran Confessions, true doctrine, i. e., correct teaching about God and His activity toward us, is not some remote possibility but a marvelous fact, the result of God's grace; and this doctrine is demonstrated in the Confessions themselves. Those who wrote our Confessions were convinced of this (FC SD, Rule and Norm, 13); but more than that, they were persuaded that true doctrine, theology (which means language about God), is of inestimable importance to the church and to individual Christians. Why?
According to the Lutheran Confessions, true doctrine, i. e., correct teaching about God and His activity toward us, is not some remote possibility but a marvelous fact, the result of God's grace; and this doctrine is demonstrated in the Confessions themselves. Those who wrote our Confessions were convinced of this (FC SD, Rule and Norm, 13); but more than that, they were persuaded that true doctrine, theology (which means language about God), is of inestimable importance to the church and to individual Christians. Why?
1.
It
is first and foremost by pure doctrine that we honor God and hallow His name,
as we pray in the First Petition of the Small Catechism. "For,"
Luther says, "there is nothing he would rather hear than to have his glory
and praise exalted above everything and his Word taught in its purity and
cherished and treasured" (LC, 111, 48).
2.
It
is by agreement in the pure doctrine that permanent concord and harmony can be
achieved in the church. "In order to preserve the pure doctrine and to
maintain a thorough, lasting, and God-pleasing concord within the church, it is
essential not only to present the true and wholesome doctrine correctly, but
also to accuse the adversaries who teach otherwise (1 Tim. 3:9; Titus 1:9; 2 Tim. 2:24; 3:16)"
(FC SD, Rule and Norm, 14).
3.
Doctrine
is important to Lutherans because they believe that Christian doctrine is not a
human fabrication but originates in God. It is God's revealed teaching about
Himself and all He has done for us in Christ. Therefore Luther says confidently
and joyfully: "The doctrine is not ours but God's" (WA, 17 11, 233).
And he will risk everything for the doctrine, for to compromise would do harm
to God and to all the world. Luther's spirit is echoed throughout our
Confessions as they affirm that their doctrine is "drawn from and
conformed to the Word of God" (FC SD, Rule and Norm, 5, 10).
4.
Pure
Christian doctrine is important for our Lutheran Confessions because it brings
eternal salvation. It "alone is our guide to salvation" (Preface to
the Book of Concord, Concordia Triglotta, p. 11). For this reason our
Confessions call it "heavenly doctrine" and they never fail to show
and apply this saving aim of evangelical doctrine.
This emphasis on
the importance of Christian doctrine is often not understood or appreciated in
our day of relativism and indifference.
How often do modern church leaders declaim that the church will never achieve purity of doctrine; nor is it necessary! Therefore we should concentrate our efforts toward ministry to people in their needs. The longest article in our Confessions deals with good works and ministry to people in their needs (Ap, IV, 122-400) and insistently admonishes the church to follow such an enterprise. But this does not make doctrine less important! Today when people are leaving the church in droves and abandoning the faith, we must keep our priorities straight.
Luther says:
How often do modern church leaders declaim that the church will never achieve purity of doctrine; nor is it necessary! Therefore we should concentrate our efforts toward ministry to people in their needs. The longest article in our Confessions deals with good works and ministry to people in their needs (Ap, IV, 122-400) and insistently admonishes the church to follow such an enterprise. But this does not make doctrine less important! Today when people are leaving the church in droves and abandoning the faith, we must keep our priorities straight.
Luther says:
The great difference between doctrine and life is obvious, even as the difference between heaven and earth. Life may be unclean, sinful, and inconsistent; but doctrine must be pure, holy, sound, unchanging ... not a tittle or letter may be omitted, however much life may fail to meet the requirements of doctrine. This is so because doctrine is God's Word, and God's truth alone, whereas life is partly our own doing.... God will have patience with man's moral failings and imperfections and forgive them. But He cannot, will not, and shall not tolerate a man's altering or abolishing doctrine itself. For doctrine involves His exalted, divine Majesty itself (WA, 30 111, 343 f.)
Strong words! But
this is the spirit of confessional Lutheranism.
Again theologians
remind us today that what matters for the Christian is his faith relation to
Christ: Faith is directed toward Christ and not a body of doctrine. Of course!
And how often do our Confessions stress just this point! But the Christ in whom
we believe and live and hope is not a phantom or myth, but the very Son of God
who became a man, who really lived and suffered and died as our Substitute, and
who rose again for our justification. In short, He is the Christ of whom we can
speak meaningfully and cognitively; and the minute we begin to speak about Him
and confess Him, we are speaking doctrine.
Again we are told
that we are saved by Christ, not by pure doctrine. True! But does this make
pure doctrine unimportant? We are not saved by good works or social concern
either. But does that make social concern and works of love of no account? No,
pure doctrine has its function. It enables us to glorify God with our lips, to
teach and proclaim a pure and saving Gospel and not a false gospel, to bring
poor sinners to know their true condition and to know God as He is, a wonderful
and gracious Savior, and not to flounder seeking and chasing phantoms.
Let us take our
Confessions seriously when they see pure doctrine as a wonderful gift and
instrument for glorifying God and building His church. This was Paul's
conviction: "Take heed unto thyself, and unto the doctrine; continue in
them; for in doing this thou shalt both save thyself and them that hear
thee" (1 Tim. 4:16). 14
Confessional
Subscription, an Evangelical Act
Lutherans have always held that creeds and confessions are necessary for the well-being of the church. Just as Christ's church and all Christians are called upon to confess their faith (Matt. 10:32; Rom. 10:9; 1 Peter 3:15; 1 John 4:2), so the church, if it is to continue to proclaim the pure Gospel in season and out of season, must for many reasons construct formal and permanent symbols and confessions and require pastors and teachers to subscribe these confessions. It is impossible for the church to be a nonconfessional church, just as impossible as to be a nonconfessing church. And so today and ever since the Reformation Lutheran churches over the world have required their pastors to subscribe the Lutheran Confessions.
Lutherans have always held that creeds and confessions are necessary for the well-being of the church. Just as Christ's church and all Christians are called upon to confess their faith (Matt. 10:32; Rom. 10:9; 1 Peter 3:15; 1 John 4:2), so the church, if it is to continue to proclaim the pure Gospel in season and out of season, must for many reasons construct formal and permanent symbols and confessions and require pastors and teachers to subscribe these confessions. It is impossible for the church to be a nonconfessional church, just as impossible as to be a nonconfessing church. And so today and ever since the Reformation Lutheran churches over the world have required their pastors to subscribe the Lutheran Confessions.
What does this
mean? With her confessions the church is speaking to the world, but also to
God, who has spoken to her in His Word-speaking to Him in total commitment,
speaking to Him by an unequivocal, unconditional response in the spirit of,
"We believe, teach, and confess" (FC Ep, Rule and Norm, 1). This
response is Scriptural, taken from Scripture itself. How often do we read in
our Confessions that the teaching presented is "grounded in God's
Word"! And so the Confessions are no more than a kind of
"comprehensive summary, rule, and norm," grounded in the Word of God,
"according to which all doctrines should be judged and the errors which
intruded should be explained and decided in a Christian way" (FC Ep,
Heading). This would be an unbelievably arrogant position to take, were it not
for the fact that all the doctrine of our Confessions is diligently and
faithfully drawn from Scripture.
And so when the
Lutheran pastor subscribes the Lutheran Confessions (and the confirmand or
layman confesses his belief in the Catechism [LC, Preface, 19]), this is a
primary way in which he willingly and joyfully and without reservation or
qualification confesses his faith and proclaims to the world what his belief
and doctrine and confession really are. Dr. C. F. W. Walther, the father of the
Missouri Synod, long ago explained the meaning of confessional subscription,
and his words are as cogent today as when they were first written:
An unconditional
subscription is the solemn declaration which the individual who wants to serve
the church makes under oath (1) that he accepts the doctrinal content of our
Symbolical Books, because he recognizes the fact that it is in 15 full
agreement with Scripture and does not militate against Scripture in any point,
whether that point be of major or minor importance; (2) that he therefore
heartily believes in this divine truth and is determined to preach this
doctrine.... Whether the subject be dealt with expressly or only incidentally,
an unconditional subscription refers to the whole content of the Symbols and
does not allow the subscriber to make any mental reservation in any point. Nor
will he exclude such doctrines as are discussed incidentally in support of
other doctrines, because the fact that they are so stamps them as irrevocable
articles of faith and demands their joyful acceptance by everyone who subscribes
the Symbols.
This is precisely
how the Confessions themselves understand subscription (FC Ep, Rule and Norm,
3, 5, 6; SD, Rule and Norm, 1, 2, 5).
Needless to say,
confessional subscription in the nature of the case is binding and
unconditional. A subscription with qualifications or reservations is a
contradiction in terms and dishonest.
Today many
Lutherans claim that such an unconditional subscription is legalistic.
Sometimes they assert that such a position is pompous and not even honest.
We might respond:
What can possibly be wrong about confessing our faith freely and taking our
confession seriously? For it is the freest and most joyful act in the world for
those of us who have searched these great confessional writings and found them
to be Scriptural and evangelical to subscribe them. Of course, to force or
bribe or wheedle a person into subscribing them would be an awful sin and a
denial of what our Confessions are, namely symbols, standards around which
Christians rally willingly and joyfully in all their Christian freedom.
Confessions Are
the Voice of the Church
When I was a boy my father told me a curious story about an occurrence in the 19th century. During the controversy among Lutherans concerning predestination, the old Norwegian Synod sided with the Missouri Synod. One member of the Norwegian Synod demurred vehemently and in his consternation said, "I am the Norwegian Synod." That, of course, was an absurdity, just as it would be absurd for me to claim, "I am the church." The church, as we shall see, 16 according to our Confessions is the total of all believers in Christ.
When I was a boy my father told me a curious story about an occurrence in the 19th century. During the controversy among Lutherans concerning predestination, the old Norwegian Synod sided with the Missouri Synod. One member of the Norwegian Synod demurred vehemently and in his consternation said, "I am the Norwegian Synod." That, of course, was an absurdity, just as it would be absurd for me to claim, "I am the church." The church, as we shall see, 16 according to our Confessions is the total of all believers in Christ.
So it is, in a
similar sense, with the Confessions. They do not belong to Luther or
Melanchthon or those who, sometimes after great struggles, wrote them. They
belong to those for whom they were written, the church. Princes subscribed the
Augsburg Confession on behalf of their churches. Luther's catechisms were
finally subscribed because the lay people had already accepted them. Thousands
of clergy subscribed the entire Book of Concord, and the only reason the laity
did not do so was the length of the book. All this suggests two things.
First, that every
Lutheran ought to be concerned with what is rightfully his and ought to agree
with the doctrine of the Confessions. But it suggests also that, if the
Confessions really belong to the entire church, then everyone in the church
ought to be united in the evangelical doctrine of the Confessions. That was the
case when the Book of Concord was compiled in 1580, and it ought to be the case
today.
Doctrinal
Unanimity, a Blessing to the Church
The Church of the Reformation after the death of Luther in one respect resembled the congregation at Corinth in the first century: It was a church highly endowed with the gifts of the Spirit, but at the same time tragically confused and divided. To the Corinthian congregation Paul wrote: "Now I beseech you, brethren, by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that ye all speak the same thing, and that there be no divisions among you; but that ye be perfectly joined together in the same mind and in the same judgment" (1 Cor. 1:10). Paul had no quarrel with the diversity of spiritual gifts he found in that congregation; he rejoiced in all that, provided it did not polarize the church. But there is only one Christ, he says, who is undivided; one Gospel; and all Christians are to be of the same mind and judgment, united in their faith and doctrine.
The Church of the Reformation after the death of Luther in one respect resembled the congregation at Corinth in the first century: It was a church highly endowed with the gifts of the Spirit, but at the same time tragically confused and divided. To the Corinthian congregation Paul wrote: "Now I beseech you, brethren, by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that ye all speak the same thing, and that there be no divisions among you; but that ye be perfectly joined together in the same mind and in the same judgment" (1 Cor. 1:10). Paul had no quarrel with the diversity of spiritual gifts he found in that congregation; he rejoiced in all that, provided it did not polarize the church. But there is only one Christ, he says, who is undivided; one Gospel; and all Christians are to be of the same mind and judgment, united in their faith and doctrine.
The Church of the
Reformation took Paul's admonition seriously when after Luther's death
doctrinal controversies arose and threatened to destroy its unity in the
Gospel. The Lutheran churches recognized that the unity of the Spirit which
Paul stressed could only be manifested when there was unanimity "in
doctrine and in all its articles and ... the right use of the holy
sacraments" (FC SD, X, 31). Their program for 17 unity and concord in a
troubled church went as follows: "The primary requirement for basic and
permanent concord within the church is a summary formula and pattern,
unanimously approved, in which the summarized doctrine commonly confessed by
the churches of the pure Christian religion is drawn together out of the Word
of God" (FC SD, Rule and Norm, 1).
What a remarkable
statement! Here is not the cynical despairing of the possibility of doctrinal
unity, so common to our relativistic age! not the sneering rejection of
doctrinal unanimity as something inimical to man's freedom and autonomy. No,
here is a statement of confidence in the unifying power of the Word and Spirit
of God. These old Lutherans were convinced that doctrinal controversies were an
offense and doctrinal aberrations pernicious to believers and unbelievers
alike. "The opinions of the erring party cannot be tolerated in the church
of God," they said, "much less be excused and defended" (FC SD,
Intro., 9). But at the same time they maintained with Paul-like optimism that
unity in doctrine and all its articles was not a remote possibility, not an
impossible goal at the end of a rainbow, but a wonderful blessing that could be
achieved by the church which would bow to the Word of God and allow the Spirit
to rule in all its life.
And so the
Lutheran confessors dare to produce a confession which all are asked to sign
and which represents the unanimous declaration of all. They pledge themselves
to the Book of Concord and confess: "We have from our hearts and with our
mouths declared in mutual agreement that we shall neither prepare nor accept a
different or a new confession of our faith. Rather, we pledge ourselves again
to those public and well-known symbols or common confessions which have at all
times and in all places been accepted in all the churches of the Augsburg
Confession" (FC SD, Rule and Norm, 2). And they dare to maintain:
"All doctrines should conform to the standards [the Lutheran Confessions]
set forth above. Whatever is contrary to them should be rejected and condemned
as opposed to the unanimous declaration of our faith" (FC Ep, Rule and
Norm, 6). Do such statements reveal pride, cocksureness, narrowness? Not at
all! But Pauline, Spirit-led confidence and optimism.
If only we could
recapture this spirit today! Openness is an in-word today. And a
"wholesome latitude" in doctrine is 18 considered by many Lutherans
to be a positive blessing to the church. Not many years ago a Lutheran synod
actually stated (but later modified, thank goodness): "We are firmly
convinced that it is neither necessary nor possible to agree in all
non-fundamental doctrines." But where do the Scriptures or our Confessions
say such a thing? Where are we ever told that we Christians need not agree on
what Scripture affirms? Yes, let us be open to people's desires and needs, to
their diversity of gifts and opinions. But not to error. Let us rather give
heed to Paul's words and speak the same thing and be perfectly joined together
in the same mind and judgment. Let us face up to doctrinal differences wherever
they arise and impinge upon our unity. And let us seek and treasure the
doctrinal unanimity of which our Confessions speak. Then we may call ourselves
Lutherans.
Source:
Getting into The Theology of Concord by Robert D. Preus (St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1977), pgs. 7-29.
Getting into The Theology of Concord by Robert D. Preus (St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1977), pgs. 7-29.
Comments